Ecological
Sustainability and Urban Green Space Urban Density
and Green Structure Case Studies Ringkøbing
-DK Stocksbridge
-UK Social
Impacts of sustainable Housing Helsinki -
Espoo -SU Political
Instruments Norway
- N MANAGEMENT OF WATER
FLOWS RINGKØBING CASE STUDY -
MANAGEMENT OF WATER FLOWS Joern Morthorst, geologist , Geological
Survey (GEUS) Urban areas: The Municipality of Ringkøbing
gives high priority to renovation of worn down sewer
systems, especially waste water pipes. They may cause
serious pollution of fresh groundwater. At a high
groundwater pressure outside the pipes, groundwater may
result in an additional load on treatment plants in areas
with combined, as well as individual, sewer
systems. Sewer overflows, detention basins and
stormwater basins should be managed by using SOCOMA
techniques. In this way overflows of polluted water from the
combined sewers, as well as less polluted surface water from
the individual sewer areas, would be "purified" before it is
led to a recipient. This is not done today. Apart from the
purification effect, the above types of basins might be used
for recreational purposes, and not necessarily be combined
with any significant infiltration (groundwater development),
as this will not be needed in the Ringkøbing area for
supplementing the existing abundant groundwater resources
for catchment. Part of the stormwater run off from paved
areas in Ringkøbing is discharged directly into the
inlet. This practice ought to be substituted by SOCOMA
facilities. A few existing detention basins ought to be
converted into or be replaced by SOCOMA facilities.
Stormwater should optimally pass an oil separator before
being discharged into the different types of basins and
treatment plants, as stormwater from paved areas with
traffic loads often contains oil and gas residue. In new residential developments it ought
to be a requirement that less polluted water from paved
areas is drained via oil separators to SOCOMA facilities and
thereby infiltrated. Draining the stormwater run off to a
recipient in the neighbourhood is another possibility
already used in a few cases. Establishing only one pipe.
i.e. for transporting waste water to the treatment plant and
avoiding pipes for stormwater makes it possible to establish
SOCOMA facilities at no extra cost. Rural areas: The water quality of recipients is also
influenced by waste water treatment in rural areas. There is
currently little or no quality control of the rural waste
water. A municipal regulation about waste water
treatment is on its way, including a description of water
quality acceptable before discharge into local recipients.
This will be supported by a general, national regulation
expected to require treatment of rural waste water by a root
zone facility. Geology: Geological and hydro-geological
conditions in the municipality show that surface soil strata
consist mainly of postglacial aeolian sand, meltwater sand
and gravel with a few inclusions of freshwater peat and clay
till. Conclusions: Urban waste water treatment in the
Municipality of Ringkoebing seems to be up-to-date (apart
from leaky sewer pipes) and norms laid down in the national
"Water Environment Plan" are closely adhered to. However,
sewer treatment in rural areas still leaves much to be
desired. Current stormwater treatment could be
improved in urban areas, however, as most of this is still
led directly to a recipient without any form for treatment
(oil seperator, SOCOMA facility). The impression today is that Municipality
of Ringkoebing has serious intentions of solving the
problems of leaky sewer pipes and treatment of sewage and
surface water prior to discharge to a recipient. However,
more rigid control is needed and a higher priority must be
given to environmentally sound water management in the new
and existing urban areas. In this way it will be possible in
addition to support both nature and recreational
opportunities. The capacity for establishing SOCOMA
facilities is present almost everywhere in the municipality,
as is the local infiltration of stormwater. The most
suitable type of facility depends on the local situation. On
the establishment of infiltration facilities, the risk of
bacteriological pollution of existing and future groundwater
catchment must be considered, in particular where
infiltration plants are located in relation to the catchment
area. This is especially true for shallow borings with
screens close to the surface, which is typical of rural
areas, while deeper catchment borings for larger supplies
are generally covered by a layer of clay of varying
thickness and consequenly are not so sensitive. In connection with all infiltration and
water catchment it is important to pay close attention to
the location of any possible known or potential pollution
sources. Click
here to return to the top of this page and to access
menus